Business Continuity Management: Without BCM, Can Your Business Recover Without Chaos?
February 4, 2026
Customer Retention Is Low? These Are the Strategies You Need to Fix
February 5, 2026APU, PPT, and PPPSPM: Not Just Documents, These Are the Business Risks
In many companies, the discussion of APU, PPT, and PPPSPM only truly gets attention after a regulatory examination, an internal audit that reaches the board of directors, or a case in the industry that ends in sanctions.
Before that, policies usually already exist, complete, neat, and stored in the compliance folder, but operational understanding is minimal.
As a result, when there are unusual transactions, gifts from business partners, or the use of high-risk third parties, no one truly understands whether these activities constitute violations or are just “ordinary business practices”.
Meanwhile, understanding the three main pillars of APU, PPT, and PPPSPM is not just a matter of regulatory compliance.
These are the foundation of risk management that protects the business from lawsuits, financial losses, and reputational damage that can be fatal.
What is APU?
APU is Anti-Money Laundering, which is an effort to prevent, detect, and report actions aimed at disguising assets derived from criminal acts (such as corruption, fraud) so they appear legitimate.
In a business context, APU is not just a reporting obligation, but a system to protect the company from being used as a “money laundering channel.”
The risk to be prevented is the company becoming part of an illegal financial chain, whether intentional or not.
In the legal framework, APU is closely related to the Crime of Money Laundering (TPPU). TPPU is a crime that occurs when assets derived from criminal acts such as corruption or fraud are disguised in origin to appear legitimate.
APU acts as a prevention mechanism so that the company does not become a means, intermediary, or facilitator of TPPU, whether due to negligence or weak internal controls.
From a regulator’s perspective, failure to adequately implement APU can place the company at risk of involvement in TPPU, even if there was no malicious intent from the start.
Examples of business activities that are vulnerable:
- Receiving payments from parties with unclear sources of fund (e.g., large cash investments without a reasonable background).
- Trade transactions involving over/under invoicing.
- Complicated payment schemes involving multiple parties.
In practice, the biggest challenge in implementing APU lies in business pressure to accept lucrative transactions that “smell” suspicious.
Sales or business development teams that are driven by targets often ignore red flags in prospective clients or partners.
What is PPT?
PPT is the Prevention of Terrorism Financing, which are actions to identify, freeze, and report funds or assets suspected to be used to support terrorist acts or terrorist organizations.
PPT is often considered part of APU, but has special characteristics: its focus is on the intended use of funds (which is futuristic) and can target funds originating from legitimate sources.
It’s often considered only relevant to banks and financial institutions. This perception is incorrect and risky. Regulators like PPATK (Indonesian Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center) have broad authority to reach all business entities, including non-financial companies.
In practice, PPT risk in non-financial companies usually arises from unusual transactions.
For example, a logistics vendor used to ship certain chemicals, an IT company providing communication systems, or a corporate charity foundation channeling funds to social institutions without proper checks.
Employees exposed to radicalism and misusing company facilities to collect funds also represent a real PPT risk.
The risk of PPT involvement increases when the company does not conduct adequate due diligence and background checks on employees or partners potentially having prohibited affiliations.
Therefore, PPT implementation demands vigilance toward abnormal transaction patterns as well as consistent controls and checks on related parties, not merely policies on paper.
What is PPPSPM?
PPPSPM is the Prevention of Financing of Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, which is an effort to prevent funds and assets from being used to support the spread of nuclear, chemical, biological, and radiological weapons and their delivery systems.
Unlike APU and PPT, PPPSPM is a highly specific field and is closely related to export controls and international trade. Moreover, PPPSPM focuses on proliferation risk.
The function of PPPSPM as a system is to ensure that the company has filters to identify and block transactions related to entities or individuals listed on international (such as UN) or national sanctions lists, especially those operating in sensitive dual-use goods and technologies.
For companies operating in advanced manufacturing, strategic commodity trading, or international logistics, PPPSPM is not an option, but a necessity.
Scope of APU, PPT, and PPPSPM
APU, PPT, and PPPSPM cover all company elements, not just the compliance or legal function. All parties involved in decision-making, transactions, and business relationships fall within this scope.
- Employees & Management: All levels must understand basic principles and indicators of suspicious transactions. The teams most at risk are procurement, sales & business development, treasury & finance, and legal.
- Products, Services, and Distribution Channels: Each business line must be assessed for vulnerability. Can your products/services be misused? Are your distribution or payment channels (such as cash-on-delivery/crypto payments) vulnerable to abuse?
- Vendors, Partners, and Third Parties: This is the most common weak point. Companies are responsible for the actions of third parties representing them. Due diligence must be conducted not only on new vendors, but also periodically on existing vendors. APU/PPT/PPPSPM compliance clauses must be included in contracts.
- Geography: Transactions with or involving countries/regions listed as high-risk jurisdictions require extra strict supervision.
In addition, there is one area that is often overlooked: due diligence on shareholders or controlling parties (beneficial owners) of business partners, as well as monitoring transactions conducted by overseas subsidiaries or joint ventures.
Implementation of APU, PPT, and PPPSPM
Correct implementation of APU, PPT, and PPPSPM policies is when these policies truly change how the company makes decisions, executes transactions, and manages business relationships.
Regulators are not looking for perfect documents, but evidence that the system works and is actively supervised.
1. Active Supervision by Directors and Board of Commissioners
Active supervision by Directors and Board of Commissioners means real involvement, not just document approval. In practice, regulators will see if top management understands the company’s APU, PPT, and PPPSPM risk profile and makes decisions based on those risks.
In many companies, the role of the Board of Directors stops at signing policies. There are no regular discussions regarding high-risk transactions, compliance findings, or near-miss incidents. As a result, APU and PPT issues only reach the Board after they become problems.
Active oversight is reflected in meeting agendas, periodic reports, and management directives toward high-risk areas. For example, limiting certain transactions, rejecting high-risk partners, or improving weak processes.
2. Policies and Procedures
Policies and procedures are the foundation of implementation, but they are only effective if they are practical. APU, PPT, and PPPSPM policies must explain what is allowed, what is prohibited, and what must be done in real situations.
In practice, the weakness that often appears is that policies are too general and procedures do not address field conditions.
For example, there is no clear guidance on handling suspicious transactions, use of third parties, or cross-border transactions.
Good procedures guide employees step by step, including escalation paths and required documentation. Without this, policies become merely normative references.
3. Internal Controls
Internal controls ensure that policies are not easily bypassed. This includes segregation of duties, tiered authorization, and reviews of high-risk transactions or partners.
In the field, internal control failures often occur due to business target pressures. Processes are expedited, checks are skipped, and justifications are made afterwards. This gap often becomes an audit finding.
In the field, internal control failures often occur due to business target pressure. Processes are accelerated, checks are skipped, and justifications are created afterward. These gaps frequently become audit findings.
Effective internal controls help companies detect deviations early, before they escalate into serious violations.
4. Management Information Systems
Management information systems support the identification, monitoring, and reporting of APU, PPT, and PPPSPM risks. They do not always have to be sophisticated systems, but they must be able to generate relevant and actionable information.
Many companies have transaction data, but it is not integrated or analyzed. As a result, abnormal transaction patterns go unnoticed.
Adequate systems help management see trends, red flags, and risk areas consistently, not based on intuition alone.
5. Human Resources and Training
Human resources are the key to successful implementation. Employees are the first parties to encounter APU, PPT, and PPPSPM risks.
A common mistake is training that is formal and one-way. In practice, effective training uses real case examples relevant to job functions. Employees need to understand the real consequences of the decisions they make.
Without adequate understanding, any system, no matter how good, will fail at the operational level.
Conclusion
APU, PPT, and PPPSPM are three compliance pillars with different focuses and different risks.
APU highlights the origin and pattern of funds, PPT emphasizes the purpose of terrorism financing, and PPPSPM focuses on preventing the financing of weapons of mass destruction proliferation.
For management, understanding these differences is not about terminology, but about business protection. Realistic and practice-based implementation will be far more effective than formal compliance that only looks neat on paper.
FAQ: APU, PPT, and PPPSPM
No. Many non-financial companies have APU, PPT, and PPPSPM risks, especially those involved in large-value transactions, cross-border activities, use of third parties, or trade in certain goods and services.
The most common mistake is assuming that having policies is sufficient. Without management oversight, practical procedures, and case-based training, policies tend not to be implemented.
Regulators assess consistency between policies, business processes, and evidence of implementation. The question is not whether documents exist, but whether the company can explain and control its risks.
